top of page

Output-Based Aid for Improved Water Access

Summary

Jakarta's local water management joined with the Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA) to pilot a project to improve sustainable piped water service access for low-income households in legal and illegal settlements across the city.

PAM Jaya, Jakarta's government-owned water utility, provides water to the city's 10 million inhabitants. Since 1997, the utility has been managed by two international concessionaires, Thames Water (TPJ) and Suez (PALYJA), which distribute water to the western and eastern parts of the city, respectively (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). The 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis significantly impacted Jakarta's leading water distributors as investments in the water sector dwindled. As a result, infrastructure upgrades and advancements in the water supply system slowed significantly, which made it unlikely that PAM Jaya would reach its 100% water access goal by 2023 (Menzies & Setiono, 2010; World Bank, 2006).

Intervention

In 2005, TPJ and PALYJA approached the Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA), a World Bank-supported NGO specializing in innovative and results-based financing for support delivering water and sanitation services in Jakarta. The two water distributors sought support in building a pilot program to generate water access for households in low-income communities throughout the city. TPJ and PALYJA pre-financed the investment, and GPOBA provided consultants for the project (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

The project was deemed necessary (by both the NGO and local distributors) as it focused specifically on households in low-income communities in Jakarta, many of which do not have access to the main water supply. The majority of Jakarta's low-income households are located in informal settlements, most of which are not serviced by formal water and sanitation services for a number of reasons: lack of capital among water distributors to finance network extensions, stigmatization of areas considered "illegal" that lack the authorization to gain access, low water supply that is unequally distributed, and lack of adequate paperwork to gain access to the main water network. Due to these blockades, individuals in low-income or informal communities end up buying water from private vendors (i.e., owners of local hydrants) and, ultimately, paying as much as 30 times more for low quality, contaminated water than they would if they were connected to the formal network (Jakarta Water, n.d.; Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

Output-Based Aid (OBA) ties public funding (via subsidies) to the achievement of specific results that support access to basic services, such as water and sanitation (Menzies & Setiono, 2010; Tremolet & Evans, 2010). In Jakarta, this OBA pilot project focused on low-income households located in areas of greater water abundance that also met Jakarta's legal requirements and necessitated few infrastructural advancements. These restrictions and government regulations excluded all slum communities within Jakarta. However, GPRBA was able to convince the city government to allow this pilot study within one slum community due to the NGO's particular focus on low-income communities (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

Challenges

The OBA pilot was not without its challenges. Due to regulations in Jakarta, the project could not be piloted across multiple informal settlements, meaning that the majority of the city's slum-dwellers continue to pay greater amounts for water from trucks and other irregular services (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Furthermore, the government initiated a policy of evicting eligible households in potential project areas, thereby rendering the residents of such households vulnerable (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Finally, there was significant pushback from local hydrant owners and informal water suppliers in informal settlements. These individuals caused disruptions that threatened project timelines, as they felt that their revenue would diminish by the implementation of a formal water supply network. Due to these issues, the pilot project could not gain significant political support in informal settlements, and the water distributor (PALYJA) had to act as the negotiator within the settlements (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Although some of the local hydrant owners agreed to PALYJA's offer to become managers of sanitation facilities and other hydrants, many did not, and these tensions continued to pose a challenge in informal settlements (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). As such, the project was only partially successful.

Outcomes

The World Bank subsidized GPOBA's pilot project, providing over USD 2 million in funding (World Bank, 2006; World Bank, 2009). The target for uptake of the project (i.e., households in which new connections would be introduced) was set at 46.5% of households located in the pilot areas. If this target was met, all costs would be reimbursed to PALJYA; if not, PALJYA would only receive partial reimbursement on a prorated scale (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). To ensure satisfactory outputs, 75% of the funding was given to PALJYA upon verification of connection, and the remaining 25% was granted only after 3 consecutive months of satisfactory service (Menzies & Setiono, 2010; Mumssen, Johannes & Kumar, n.d.; World Bank, 2006). Recognizing the need for effective stakeholder engagement, especially within informal settlements, PALYJA established a stakeholder steering committee, composed of local community leaders, community-based organizations (CBOs), and NGOs, to facilitate project implementation and gain stakeholders' acceptance (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

Two types of water service were implemented through the OBA, namely "Type I" standard household connections for IDR 120,000 (USD 13) and "Type II" high density, informal slum connections (on a "master meter" basis) for IDR 12,000 (USD 1.30) (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). The pilot project ended in 2013 after 8 years of service and had numerous positive outcomes (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). For example, 5,042 low-income households were connected to the formal water network (4,629 households gained standard "Type I" connections and another 413 gained "Type II" connections), resulting in a total of 50,000 individual beneficiaries (World Bank, 2011). Furthermore, the pilot project showcased the viability of a creative financing method for water and sanitation project implementation, based on incentivization and achieving specific targets. Finally, the project also allowed an option for individuals who owned or maintained local hydrants in informal settlements to become managers of newly developed sanitation facilities or hydrants, so as to avoid potential conflicts between these individuals and water distributors (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

After the project's completion in 2013, CBOs became the primary billing and collection agencies for these projects (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Ultimately, the OBA pilot project and partnership between the World Bank and Jakarta's water providers (TPJ and PALYJA) was able to improve access to clean water for over 5,000 families. Although the project had its shortcomings, it serves as a potential model for the use of output-based aid and results-based financing in many developing areas globally, particularly those municipalities facing challenges regarding water and sanitation provision in informal settlements and low-income communities.

References

Output-Based Aid for Improved Water Access

Summary

Jakarta's local water management joined with the Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA) to pilot a project to improve sustainable piped water service access for low-income households in legal and illegal settlements across the city.

PAM Jaya, Jakarta's government-owned water utility, provides water to the city's 10 million inhabitants. Since 1997, the utility has been managed by two international concessionaires, Thames Water (TPJ) and Suez (PALYJA), which distribute water to the western and eastern parts of the city, respectively (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). The 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis significantly impacted Jakarta's leading water distributors as investments in the water sector dwindled. As a result, infrastructure upgrades and advancements in the water supply system slowed significantly, which made it unlikely that PAM Jaya would reach its 100% water access goal by 2023 (Menzies & Setiono, 2010; World Bank, 2006).

Issue
Intervention

In 2005, TPJ and PALYJA approached the Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA), a World Bank-supported NGO specializing in innovative and results-based financing for support delivering water and sanitation services in Jakarta. The two water distributors sought support in building a pilot program to generate water access for households in low-income communities throughout the city. TPJ and PALYJA pre-financed the investment, and GPOBA provided consultants for the project (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

The project was deemed necessary (by both the NGO and local distributors) as it focused specifically on households in low-income communities in Jakarta, many of which do not have access to the main water supply. The majority of Jakarta's low-income households are located in informal settlements, most of which are not serviced by formal water and sanitation services for a number of reasons: lack of capital among water distributors to finance network extensions, stigmatization of areas considered "illegal" that lack the authorization to gain access, low water supply that is unequally distributed, and lack of adequate paperwork to gain access to the main water network. Due to these blockades, individuals in low-income or informal communities end up buying water from private vendors (i.e., owners of local hydrants) and, ultimately, paying as much as 30 times more for low quality, contaminated water than they would if they were connected to the formal network (Jakarta Water, n.d.; Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

Output-Based Aid (OBA) ties public funding (via subsidies) to the achievement of specific results that support access to basic services, such as water and sanitation (Menzies & Setiono, 2010; Tremolet & Evans, 2010). In Jakarta, this OBA pilot project focused on low-income households located in areas of greater water abundance that also met Jakarta's legal requirements and necessitated few infrastructural advancements. These restrictions and government regulations excluded all slum communities within Jakarta. However, GPRBA was able to convince the city government to allow this pilot study within one slum community due to the NGO's particular focus on low-income communities (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

Challenges

The OBA pilot was not without its challenges. Due to regulations in Jakarta, the project could not be piloted across multiple informal settlements, meaning that the majority of the city's slum-dwellers continue to pay greater amounts for water from trucks and other irregular services (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Furthermore, the government initiated a policy of evicting eligible households in potential project areas, thereby rendering the residents of such households vulnerable (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Finally, there was significant pushback from local hydrant owners and informal water suppliers in informal settlements. These individuals caused disruptions that threatened project timelines, as they felt that their revenue would diminish by the implementation of a formal water supply network. Due to these issues, the pilot project could not gain significant political support in informal settlements, and the water distributor (PALYJA) had to act as the negotiator within the settlements (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Although some of the local hydrant owners agreed to PALYJA's offer to become managers of sanitation facilities and other hydrants, many did not, and these tensions continued to pose a challenge in informal settlements (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). As such, the project was only partially successful.

Outcomes

The World Bank subsidized GPOBA's pilot project, providing over USD 2 million in funding (World Bank, 2006; World Bank, 2009). The target for uptake of the project (i.e., households in which new connections would be introduced) was set at 46.5% of households located in the pilot areas. If this target was met, all costs would be reimbursed to PALJYA; if not, PALJYA would only receive partial reimbursement on a prorated scale (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). To ensure satisfactory outputs, 75% of the funding was given to PALJYA upon verification of connection, and the remaining 25% was granted only after 3 consecutive months of satisfactory service (Menzies & Setiono, 2010; Mumssen, Johannes & Kumar, n.d.; World Bank, 2006). Recognizing the need for effective stakeholder engagement, especially within informal settlements, PALYJA established a stakeholder steering committee, composed of local community leaders, community-based organizations (CBOs), and NGOs, to facilitate project implementation and gain stakeholders' acceptance (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

Two types of water service were implemented through the OBA, namely "Type I" standard household connections for IDR 120,000 (USD 13) and "Type II" high density, informal slum connections (on a "master meter" basis) for IDR 12,000 (USD 1.30) (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). The pilot project ended in 2013 after 8 years of service and had numerous positive outcomes (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). For example, 5,042 low-income households were connected to the formal water network (4,629 households gained standard "Type I" connections and another 413 gained "Type II" connections), resulting in a total of 50,000 individual beneficiaries (World Bank, 2011). Furthermore, the pilot project showcased the viability of a creative financing method for water and sanitation project implementation, based on incentivization and achieving specific targets. Finally, the project also allowed an option for individuals who owned or maintained local hydrants in informal settlements to become managers of newly developed sanitation facilities or hydrants, so as to avoid potential conflicts between these individuals and water distributors (Menzies & Setiono, 2010).

After the project's completion in 2013, CBOs became the primary billing and collection agencies for these projects (Menzies & Setiono, 2010). Ultimately, the OBA pilot project and partnership between the World Bank and Jakarta's water providers (TPJ and PALYJA) was able to improve access to clean water for over 5,000 families. Although the project had its shortcomings, it serves as a potential model for the use of output-based aid and results-based financing in many developing areas globally, particularly those municipalities facing challenges regarding water and sanitation provision in informal settlements and low-income communities.

Issues
Water Governance and Policy
Solutions
Affordable & Inclusive Water Access
References

Jakarta Water. (n.d.). [Text/HTML]. World Bank. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P102529


Kooy, M., Walter, C. T., & Prabaharyaka, I. (2018). Inclusive development of urban water services in Jakarta: The role of groundwater. Habitat International, 73, 109-118.


Menzies, I., & Setiono, I. M. (2010). Output-Based Aid in Indonesia: Improved Access to Water Services for Poor Households in Western Jakarta | The Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA). OBA Approaches, 38. https://www.gprba.org/knowledge/publications/output-based-aid-indonesia-improved-access-water-services-poor-households


Mumssen, Y., Johannes, L., & Kumar, G. (n.d.). Output-Based Aid Lessons Learned and Best Practices (No. 53644; Directions in Development: Finance). The World Bank. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from https://library.pppknowledgelab.org/documents/2238/download


Tremolet, S., & Evans, B. (2010). Output-Based Aid and Sustainable Sanitation. Water and Sanitation Program. https://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp/files/publications/WSP_OBA_sanitation.pdf


World Bank. (2006). Indonesia-OBA for Improved Access to Water Services in Jakarta Project (English). http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/661641468038719298/pdf/492900PAD0GPOB101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf


World Bank. (2009). A Review of the Use of Output-Based Aid Approaches (IDA15 Mid-Term Review). https://ida.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/oba_ida15mtr.pdf


World Bank. (2011). GPOBA Annual Report 2011 | The Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA). https://www.gprba.org/knowledge/publications/gpoba-annual-report-2011

bottom of page